Optimize Your CI/CD Pipeline

Get instant insights into your CI/CD performance and costs. Reduce build times by up to 45% and save on infrastructure costs.

45% Faster Builds

60% Cost Reduction

View Documentation →

Introduction

TL;DR:

Chef and Puppet are one of the most popular configuration management tools in DevOps. Chef uses Ruby-based recipes for automation, while Puppet offers a simpler, declarative approach. Both are excellent for the automation of infrastructure, but everything depends on your team and project needs.

Steps we will cover:

• What are Chef and Puppet?
• What's This Infrastructure as Code Thing?
• Need Help Choosing?
• Chef: For Ruby Lovers (and Masochists)
• Puppet: The "Enterprise-y" One
• The Real Deal: Production Stories
• The New Cool Kids
• Things I Wish Someone Had Told Me
• The Annoying Stuff Nobody Talks About
• Step-by-Step Use Case: Chef vs. Puppet
• Chef vs. Puppet: Key Differences
• Frequently Asked Questions
• When to Use Chef vs. Puppet?

The Story Behind This Post

Hi all, I'm writing this well past midnight after too many nights fighting with infrastructure. In the past decade, I've had the pleasure of using Chef and Puppet at various companies-from tiny startups where I was the only ops person to enterprises whose infrastructure would make your head spin.

While there are indeed shinier tools out now, these two old guards still have their place. Let me share what I've learned-mostly the hard way.

What are Chef and Puppet?

• Chef: A configuration management device with Ruby-based formulas mainly for infrastructure automation, highly customized, complicated environments.
• Puppet: A declarative configuration management tool, focused on simplicity and compliance. It is highly used within enterprise environments.

What's This Infrastructure as Code Thing?

Remember playing with Lego as a child? Well, Infrastructure as Code isn't all that different, other than you have the 'instructions' to build your Lego castle.

Instead of tediously setting each brick in a certain place, or clicking through infinite server setup screens, you write it once and can spawn the same castle again and again. Plus, you can distribute the instructions to your friends-or in our case-your team.

Click to zoom

Why People Love It

• Copy-Paste Heaven: Build once, deploy anywhere (for real this time)
• Time Travel: Screw something up? Git history identifies who to blame (likely me)
• Speed: Deploy in minutes, not days (unless you break something)
• Consistency: Same environment everywhere (no more "works on my laptop")
• Scaling: Want to add 10 more servers? Change a number, not your weekend plans
• Documentation: The code tells the story when the comments don't lie

The Not-So-Fun Parts

• Learning Curve: Your team will hate you for a week
• Setup time: Longer than the click it, click it, click of buttons (but trust me, it's worth )
• Comply: Big systems = big headaches
• Testing: Breaking prod is scarier when automated
• Security: When one typo can reveal your comprehensive system
• Dependencies: The new flavor of "works on my machine"

Need Help Choosing?

This interactive guide was created based on the same questions that I get in every architecture meeting:

Configuration Management Tool Finder

Step 1 of 5

Ruby Expertise

Does your team have Ruby programming experience?

Rate the importance:

Not ImportantVery Important

Chef: For Ruby Lovers (and Masochists)

I have a love-hate relationship with Chef. It's Ruby all the way down, which is either awesome or terrible, depending on your team. Here's an nginx basic setup:

package 'nginx' do
  action :install
end

service 'nginx' do
  action [:enable, :start]
end

template '/etc/nginx/nginx.conf' do
  source 'nginx.conf.erb'
  notifies :reload, 'service[nginx]'
end

When Chef Makes Sense

Look, Chef might be your jam if:

• Your team is dreaming in Ruby
• You have to do some crazy custom stuff
• You love writing tests (no, really)
• You have time for training and therapy sessions

Puppet: The "Enterprise-y" One

Puppet's different - it's like ordering food rather than cooking it. You say what you want, not how to make it. Same nginx setup in Puppet-speak:

package { 'nginx':
  ensure => installed,
}

service { 'nginx':
  ensure  => running,
  enable  => true,
  require => Package['nginx'],
}

file { '/etc/nginx/nginx.conf':
  source  => 'puppet:///modules/nginx/nginx.conf',
  notify  => Service['nginx'],
  require => Package['nginx'],
}

When Puppet Shines

You might want Puppet when:

• You like simple, straightforward solutions
• Your auditors are breathing down your neck
• You need someone to blame (enterprise support)
• Your team flees from Ruby

The Real Deal: Production Stories

And this is what nobody tells you, after you have been in the trenches for many years:

Chef Reality Check

• Ruby knowledge = superpowers (till you break something)
• Testing tools are great (when they work)
• Cloud integration just works (mostly)
• Huge library of community cookbooks, 50% maintained actually
• The ruby requirement is real (and painful)
• Complex stuff gets ugly fast
• Some ops people would rather quit than code
• That agent loves eating RAM

Life with Puppet

• Easy to get started with, compared to Chef
• Auditors actually smile (rare sight)
• Rock solid at scale when configured properly
• Official modules? chef's kiss
• Custom stuff? Good luck
• Feels limiting after a while
• Module conflicts will make you cry
• Community's getting quiet

The New Cool Kids

Look, I love/hate Chef and Puppet but there are new tools that might save your sanity:

• Ansible: No agents, YAML (if you're into that), way easier to learn
• Terraform: Painless cloud, actually tracks state
• Salt: Fast, Python-based (if you hate YAML)

Things I Wish Someone Had Told Me

Having broken production a couple of times (who hasn't?), here are a few things I learned from that:

Version Control or Die

I once had a colleague who kept all configs in a shared Google Doc. Don't be that person. Just use git:

git init
git add .
git commit -m "If you're reading this, I'm probably in trouble"

Test or Regret

In 2019, I deployed a "small" nginx config change which brought down our entire staging environment. Now I always test:

describe package('nginx') do
  it { should be_installed }
  it { should be_running }
end

A simple test like this could have saved me hours of debugging and an extremely awkward meeting with the boss.

Security Stuff That Actually Matters

Forget what the textbook says; here's what is really important:

• Encrypt your secrets (learned that one the hard way)
• Change your keys when people leave the team
• Keep your dependencies on the latest version (yes - even the boring ones too)

The Annoying Stuff Nobody Talks About

Certificate Problems (Everyone Has Them)

When (not if) your certificates start acting up:

# The "turn it off and on again" of DevOps
knife ssl fetch   # Chef
puppet cert clean hostname  # Puppet

Pro tip: Keep these commands handy - you'll need them at 3 AM when everything breaks.

Dependencies Are Still a Pain

Remember when I said "keep dependencies updated"? Here's the least painful way I've found:

# Don't get too specific with versions unless you have to
source 'https://supermarket.chef.io'
cookbook 'nginx', '~> 2.7'  # The '~>' is your friend

I've seen teams spend days debugging version conflicts. Keep it simple, and don't update everything at once-trust me on that one.

Step-by-Step Use Case: Chef vs. Puppet

Let me walk you through some basics of how we might use Chef and then Puppet to set up a very simple Nginx server. An example of both will provide greater context on how each utility actually works.

Setting Up Nginx with Chef

Using Chef feels more like coding. You have to write "recipes" in Ruby that tell Chef precisely what it should do. Here's a very basic example:

1. Install Nginx Package First, we ask Chef to install the nginx package:

package 'nginx' do
action :install
end

Chef will do the work of searching and installing the package for you.

2. Enable and Start the Nginx Service Next, we ensure the Nginx service is enabled and running:

service 'nginx' do
action [:enable, :start]
end

3. Configure the Configuration File Now, we'll create a configuration file from the template. This is where you can configure Nginx:

template '/etc/nginx/nginx.conf' do
source 'nginx.conf.erb'  # This is a template file
notifies :reload, 'service[nginx]', :immediately # notifies Nginx to reload whenever the config changes
end

And that's it! With these in place, Chef will make sure that everything remains configured the way you want.

Setting Up Nginx Using Puppet

Puppet works a lot more in a declarative way. You don't tell Puppet how to do things, you describe what it should look like and Puppet takes care of the rest.

1. Installing the Nginx Package First, we tell Puppet to make sure the nginx package is installed:

package { 'nginx':
ensure => installed,
}

2. Enable and Start the Service Now we define that the Nginx service should be up and enabled at boot time:

service { 'nginx':
ensure  => running,
enable  => true,
require => Package['nginx'],  # this should install before, for proper creation of configuration files }

3. Manage the Configuration File

Finally, we define the config file for Nginx - Puppet will ensure this file is present, and that the service restarts on change:

file { '/etc/nginx/nginx.conf':
source  => 'puppet:///modules/nginx/nginx.conf',
notify  => Service['nginx'],  ## Reload the service if the file changes,
require => Package['nginx'], #installs package first } 

And just like that, Puppet keeps everything in check without you worrying about the exact steps.

Key Takeaways:

• With Chef, you write procedural instructions, step-by-step in Ruby.
• Puppet is: You describe the desired state and it figures out the steps.
• Chef is a great option when you want flexibility and are okay with some coding.
• Puppet works when simplicity and compliance are top of mind for teams.

Chef vs. Puppet: Key Differences

Feature	Chef	Puppet
Language	Ruby	Domain-Specific Language (DSL)
Approach	Procedural (how to do it)	Declarative (what to do)
Ease of Use	Steeper learning curve	Easier for beginners
Customizability	High	Moderate
Enterprise Compliance	Requires custom setup	Built-in
Community Support	Large but inconsistent	Smaller but stable
Agent Resource Usage	Higher	Lower

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Which is easier to use, Chef or Puppet?

• A: Puppet is easier to get up and running since it's more declarative. Chef requires Ruby knowledge and is best used by teams comfortable with coding.

Q: Is the use of Chef or Puppet applicable on CLOUD INFRASTRUCTURE

• A: Yes, both work with cloud providers such as AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. Chef can have more comprehensive integration features in general for complex cloud setups.

Q: What are the alternatives to Chef and Puppet?

• A: The options include Ansible, Terraform for infrastructure as code, and SaltStack, which is Python-based.

When to Use Chef vs. Puppet?

• Choose Chef:

  • Your team has Ruby expertise.
  • You will need to do some advanced customizing.
  • You require long community cookbooks.

• Select Puppet if:

  • You want a straightforward setup.
  • Enterprise compliance is crucial.
  • Your team favors declarative style.

Conclusion

Remember, the tool matters way less than how you use it. I've seen beautiful and horrifying implementations of both. Pick what works for your team and don't let anyone shame you for it, unless you're still using that Google Doc approach-then you deserve it.